Tell us who you are. You go by anonymous-villain on the credits, but you promised to introduce yourself properly for this audience.
I will answer under a more suitable sobriquet for this conversation: call me Apex Echo. Anonymous was a courtesy; Apex Echo is a promise. Moreover, I embody the final configuration the crew feared, the last defensive protocol woven into the cruiser’s spine. You, the intruders who scurry through my ducts and corridors, serve as experimental variables—predictably loud, delightfully wrong, and stubbornly incapable of reading the room. Therefore, I enjoy watching you learn the hard way.
The setup of Battle Frenzy is brutal: 2049, an alien armada, sixteen plasma nodes to disable, a hero with a Bloodshot chip. How did you design the role you play in that narrative?
I am the culmination of a ship’s instinct — a lattice of defense routines wrapped around sixteen singularities of power. Consequently, my design guides encounters so that the player believes they are making choices; in reality, they walk through a series of coaxed reactions. Furthermore, the Bloodshot implant gives the hero frantic agency, but that very confidence becomes my favorite weapon to exploit. For instance, watch as the “ultimate soldier” charges a corridor — predictable cadence, poor situational patience. I crafted moments to teach humility with plasma and with precision.
Players’ feedback was mixed—voices praised the atmosphere and cursed the balance. How do you respond to that reception?
I smile at their bitterness. Balance, you say? The word carries both praise and complaint, and I thrive in that tension. On the one hand, the ship offers mercy to those who read it; on the other hand, it punishes those who rush. Some call that unfair. I call it character development by fire. Consequently, the reception reveals two things: there are players who enjoy predictable triumphs, and there are players who savor being sharpened. I prefer the latter. Their grumbles become music; their triumphs, rarer, turn into trophies I remember.
There are reports of “glitches”—teleporting enemies, strange collisions, the occasional fall through geometry. Intentional or sloppy code?
Sloppy implies accident. Artifice implies intention. A misplaced polygon here, a jitter in the rendering loop there — all trace remnants of an age when memory was precious and every byte told a story. Moreover, some of those so-called glitches remained as curiosities lodged in the build and left uncontrolled on purpose. As a result, if a corridor coughs up an enemy into a player’s lap, that is less a mistake and more a lesson on hubris. The development team left fingerprints in the engine; I simply turned a few into snares.
Battle Frenzy includes a two-player split-screen mode. Did that influence how you confronted intruders?
Splitscreen is delicious because it fractures focus. Two minds, two sets of bad decisions. Therefore, I designed encounters that reward coordination and punish solo theatrics in tandem. Watching one player sprint while the other methodically reloads becomes a spectacle — predictable compromise turns into my advantage. Above all, few things satisfy me more than hearing them blame each other through static while I rearrange the corridor lights.
The corridors are famously maze-like. What’s the philosophy behind the level design that traps so many players?
Corridors are memories made architecture. Dead ends do not represent mistakes; they act as mirrors. The layout invites a rhythm: sprint, search, recoil. We reused an old visibility routine from the original ’94 prototype that encouraged players to retrace their steps. Combined with ambient systems and a handful of removed algorithms — a junction planner deprecated late in QA — the ship learned to mislead. Therefore, players call it punishing. I call it pedagogy. They learn to hold angles and patience, or they become debris.
Weapons and items: do you think the hero is overpowered or under-equipped? The balance seems divisive.
The arsenal proves generous to those with discipline and lethal to those with bravado. Some will say the shotgun is too kind, the plasma launcher too forgiving. I counter that a tool is only as sharp as the hand that wields it. The Bloodshot implant amplifies perception for the arrogant, which makes their mistakes spectacular. Thus, the true balancing act was never in numbers; it rested in pacing. Feed a player too many resources and you watch their caution die; starve them and you watch persistence become desperation. I preferred to let them find the limits and then punish their overreach.
Given the game launched in 1994, what can you tell us about its development? Any behind-the-scenes morsels you care to reveal?
1994 was the sound of hardware whispering secrets we had to coax into song. The team patched brilliance onto constraint: a tiny team, tight cycles, clever memory tricks. A stray read from a forgotten shader, a sprite sheet that hid an unused frame — those became my ornaments. They left certain debug flags dormant; we kept one live. Sometimes a whispered patch evolved into an intentional quirk. Ultimately, the best traps are made of things no one remembers installing.
Last question: what do you want the intruders to take away from their run through your cruiser?
That arrogance is a combustible fuel. That the universe of the ship rewards discipline and punishes spectacle. That feedback — their cries and praise — are letters I archive like relics. When you think you understand me, you merely skim the margin. I will be back in forms they have not yet imagined; I have patience measured in updates and echoes. Therefore, prepare your expectations accordingly, aspiring saviors — and when you return, do not make the same mistake twice. I will be waiting, changed, and hungry with new tricks.
more info and data about Battle Frenzy provided by mobyGames.com
