You insist we call you anonymous-villain for this conversation. Who are you really, and why did you take a city that once belonged to order and make it your theatre of chaos?
Call me anonymous-villain and nothing less. Names are instruments; I tuned one to perfection and unleashed it in the streets. The city once drowned in complacency—its feeders fat on law and habit. Therefore, I applied a sharper geometry. Three officers marched in to “topple” me, but they became punctuation in my sentence: predictable, earnest, annoyingly persistent. Since they insisted on rewriting my design, I answered with obstacles that acted as both threat and lesson.
Streets of Rage is often called Sega’s answer to Final Fight. Did you plan much of the game’s structure—the elevators, death drops, and the support police car—or did the designers hand you something prebuilt?
Structure? I wrote the margins. The elevator becomes a merciless corridor, while the tiles hide the drop and the apples and turkeys offer mock salvation. The designers provided a canvas of left-to-right motion; meanwhile, I painted pits and vertical betrayals. The support police car? A flourish designed to punish overconfidence. Players think the rules are simple—three buttons, forward motion, a boss at the end. Yet simplicity creates the perfect stage for cruelty. They discover this truth the moment they misjudge a jump and meet gravity’s impatience.
Players love comparing Adam, Axel, and Blaze. Did you ever worry one of them might be too fun to master and ruin your plans?
Worry? No. Instead, I felt delight. Adam’s careful arcs, Axel’s speed, and Blaze’s nimble reach all embody arrogance. I revel when a player trains Adam like a battering ram, only to realize the “hard hitter” strikes back during one fragile frame window. Moreover, I enjoyed watching speed meet trap and strength meet timing. Their balance is tuned precisely so mastery feels earned. However, the instant a player believes they hold mastery, I rearrange the room.
The game is praised for its straightforward control scheme—jump, attack, ranged support. Did you exploit that simplicity when designing enemy patterns and bosses?
Of course. Simplicity bets on human instinct; however, I raised the stakes. With only three buttons, I crafted encounters where one poorly timed support attack or misread grapple ends the run. Grapples, back attacks, and flying moves each hold charm, but each carries betrayal. Players rely on the support car, yet I twist the screen’s geometry and enemy placements to turn that aid into bait. Elegant controls allow elegant punishments.
There are stories of “glitches”—a flickering sprite, an elevator hitbox that favors certain enemies. Were those intentional or happy accidents?
In truth, happy accidents are the best fiction. Some quirks were blessed by constraint: a small team, tight memory, hardware that demanded efficiency. Where memory thinned, we recycled patterns. Where drawing time grew short, we reused frames. As a result, beautiful imperfections emerged. Yes—I noticed which glitches frustrated clean runs and left them in place with a knowing smile. Call them accidents if you must; I call them seasoning. Players groan, and I take that as proof my work stings.
Reception has been generally positive, putting the game in a comfortably competitive middle tier. How do you react to that grade and the critics who celebrate or begrudge it?
A middling crown fits me well. Reviewers call it balanced, respectable, infuriating enough to be beloved. Some accuse me of unfairness, yet balance remains my most cunning instrument. Praise for polish feels charming, while complaints about difficulty taste delicious. My architecture thrives between admiration and annoyance. Players leave satisfied enough to return, yet furious enough to try again. That is the sweetest compliment.
Players often discuss tag attacks in co-op. Did you design encounters to punish teamwork as well as lone wolves?
Absolutely. Teamwork is arrogance wearing two faces, and I enjoy toppling both. Tag attacks offer theatrical flourishes—when two players coordinate they feel like gods. Therefore, I answer with pinch points and enemies that exploit the gap between them. Co-op exposes cooperation’s blind spots: one mistimes a jump, the other tumbles into a hazard. Meanwhile, the elevator becomes a stage where partnership either sings or collapses into bickering. I shape both outcomes to my satisfaction.
Finally, any message for the players who tried and failed, and those who succeeded and felt hollow at the end?
To the ones who failed: good. Failure teaches a sharper eye and a faster thumb. To the ones who succeeded and felt something like emptiness—remember the climb. Victory is a photograph; the struggle is a mirror. Keep returning; I will rearrange my rooms each time and steal new rhythms from your habits. As for the city—I will not be fully toppled. I prefer to be a problem that occasionally solves itself in more interesting ways. Expect a new geometry soon. The streets are patient, and so am I.
more info and data about Streets of Rage provided by mobyGames.com
